ICGvsSBET
Intchains vs SharpLink Gaming
Side-by-side Ethereum treasury comparison: holdings, market cap, mNAV ratio, cost basis, and recent purchases. Numbers refresh every 5 minutes from SEC filings and live market data.
ICG
Intchains
🇨🇳 CN
11,670 ETH
$21.8M market value
SBET
SharpLink Gaming
🇺🇸 US
886,725 ETH
$1.7B market value
Metric
ICG
SBET
ETH holdings
11,670 ETH
886,725 ETH
Market value of ETH
$21.8M
$1.7B
Average cost per ETH
—
$3,160.69
Total cost basis
—
$2.8B
mNAV (market cap ÷ ETH value)
2.78×
0.69×
Last disclosed purchase
Apr 13, 2026
Jun 30, 2026
Country
🇨🇳 CN
- Apr 13, 2026+7,117 ETH$16.9M
- Jun 30, 2026+10,000 ETH$16.1M
- May 11, 2026+4,285 ETH$10.0M
- Mar 9, 2026+5,275 ETH$10.5M
- Dec 17, 2025+3,571 ETH$10.1M
ICG vs SBET: frequently asked
Which company holds more Ethereum, ICG or SBET?▾
SharpLink Gaming (SBET) holds 886,725 ETH, compared to Intchains's (ICG) 11,670 ETH — roughly 76.0× more.
What's the total Ethereum value on the balance sheets of ICG and SBET?▾
ICG holds $21.8M worth of Ethereum at current market prices. SBET holds $1.7B.
Who has a lower cost basis per ETH, ICG or SBET?▾
Cost basis disclosure is inconsistent across these two entities; check each company's detail page for per-purchase history.
When did ICG last buy Ethereum?▾
ICG disclosed a 7,117 ETH purchase on April 13, 2026.
When did SBET last buy Ethereum?▾
SBET disclosed a 10,000 ETH purchase on June 30, 2026.